Opinion: Did Feminism & Facebook Kill the Auto Industry?

Feminism, Opinion — By Speak Equal on June 4, 2009 at 2:58 pm

So what is this man trying to say?

As I was driving to pick my partner up from work this morning, I was listening to NPR as usual, and was surprised to hear quite the little rant by P.J. O’Rourke.

He was stating his belief that Feminism and Facebook killed the car.

Surprisingly, I wasn’t as angry as I thought I would be while listening to him. In fact, I was actually quite amused. Sure, his statements could be viewed as tactless and insensitive. However, I viewed his rant as more of a comical jab at the myriad of excuses auto industry executives have given for their historic failure, as well as a slap in the face to those parents whom think the internet is not (and has not) revolutionized their homes, and thus their roles as parents.

Not surprisingly, there are those that were (and probably with great reason) offended at what Mr. O’Rourke had to say. I’ve taken the excerpt from the essay that was read on the radio today and posted it here for you to read.

Do you think what Mr. O’Rourke had to say was valid? Are you offended? If so, why?

Read the essay, leave me your comments!

Woe Is My Car Industry!

NPR: MORNING EDITION — I blame feminism and Facebook for the death of the American automobile. I’m a Republican, so I blame everything on feminism — or commies. But commies are making a profit building cars in China. And I’m a curmudgeon, so I hate all those Inter-netty, dotty-com sort of things. (About time this computer fad blew over, is what I think.)

Anyway, feminism and Facebook killed the car. The whole point of cars — why boys had to have them — was girls. A boy took a girl for a ride in a car. Then they parked somewhere with a view — of submarine races, for instance. Or they ran out of gas. Or something, and … gender identity! Leading to patriarchal social constructs, and — with luck — some smooching.

Feminism didn’t end the smooching. But it did end a lot of marriages. Dad came home from the phallocentric office or factory, and Mom threw a Bella Abzug at him. Feminism also ended job discrimination against women. A woman could get hired as an able-bodied seaman, a man about town — even a strongman in the circus.

So, with Dad off living with his second wife in Phoenix and Mom at work, boys and girls didn’t need to go for a ride. The whole house was Lovers’ Lane. The last time any serious smooching was done in a car was about 1979, and the kids got tangled in the mandatory shoulder belts, and the air bag went off, and they aren’t going steady anymore.

(This is a shame because by the late 1980s, cars — particularly minivans and SUVs — were providing a smooch-friendly environment. What with fold-up seats and fold-down video screens, it was a regular hotel suite in there.)

But why bother when kids could walk to each other’s parentally unsupervised homes, or ride a bike or a skateboard. Contemporary teen sexual activity has a small carbon footprint.

The other point of a car, besides taking a girl for a ride in it, was finding a girl to take for a ride. Boys did this by looking cool in cool cars. A few boys — high school football stars and such — could look cool without cars. But these were the boys who had cool cars anyway.

Facebook destroyed “cruising the burger stand.” You could have two Corvettes and drive them both at the same time and not look as cool as you could make yourself look on Facebook. Corvettes come with a lot of accessories, but not Photoshop. And what with e-mailing, tweeting, texting and cell phonery, boys and girls could meet each other at the speed of light.

Our tastes, our interests, our passions are formed in youth. Our passion for the automobile is gone. The car has rolled away to die somewhere because we don’t love it anymore. Why fill the tank, check the oil, put air in the tires and drive to hell and gone when heaven is just a mouse-click away?

Tags: , , , , ,
  • http://vyzion360.com vyzion360

    As, I mentioned in the original post, I wasn’t so much offended as I was amused. I don’t think for one minute that Mr. O’Rourke SERIOUSLY believes that Feminism and Facebook are to blame for the collapse of the auto industry.

    I think his essay could be more equated to that really terrible, politically incorrect joke that’s told at the party just as the music dies down … and to make matters worse, no one laughs.

    Meh.

  • http:www.stankcheese.wordpress.com Vanessa

    Eh… we have to laugh at something…
    Some sexist jokes are funny
    Some gay jokes are funny
    Some racial jokes are funny
    Some religious jokes are funny

    These are sensitive times…
    Everybody wants to be PC
    But we still need to laugh at it ALL every once in a while…

    I personally was not offended.

  • http://vyzion360.com vyzion360

    Yeah … P.J. O’Rourke is the epitome of a crotchety old man, you know … *lol*

  • http://studwithswag.com knowledge

    of course it’s meant to be sarcastically offensive, but it’s not. i’m not offended one bit. in fact, i’ll play along and say that since feminism in itself ruined the car, certain masculine attitudes and behaviors that bread the need for feminism ruined the car then.

    besides, if he knew any lesbians he’d know that we do just as many naughty things in cars as guys and then some. ford didn’t have smooching in the back seat making out in mind when he invented the car, but just because the boys got to have mostly all of the fun when it came to cars doesn’t mean its the fault of feminism. i can only imagine what he’d be saying about horses and the death of them if we were living in the days of the wild and not so wild west. sheesh. i tell ya.

blog comments powered by Disqus

Switch to our mobile site